LA Contemporary Dance Company Indeed

I can be a real procrastinator. Thank you, chock-full Internet. You devour my time! I am therefore a day and a half behind writing on the LA Contemporary Dance Company performance in the totally awesome Mimoda space on the west side. Called "Fight or Flight," the eye-level concert featured - features, since it's a two-weekender - work by Scott Hislop, Kate Hutter, and Adam Parson. Hey-o! Apparently Mr. Hislop is part of the finest moment of dance in at least somewhat recent high-schoolers-with-impossibly-cool-lives movie history. And I'm sold!, right?

Well, no. You see, I moved to Los Angeles for some pretty kooky reasons. High among them sits the fact that many a dance history textbook will follow a New York career in dancemaking until the human subject a. dies, b. goes off the deep end, or c. moves to the West Coast. The three seem equally fateful. I assure you they are not, but the most common response from my friends and co-dancers is "huh?" They moved to that other part of California to do wonderful things. I moved to La-La LAnd, and I can't even ironically link Perez Hilton.

I promise this is going somewhere.

I vacillate between denying the detached superficiality of this town and intellectualizing it. (I especially love car culture theories.) But superficiality is always there, and what drives me batty about "Fight or Flight" is not the lyrical alt-pop music. It is not the choreographed virtuosity for virtuosity's sake! And it's not even the thorough absence of any "Fight or Flight" themes at all in the products under the title. Nope, what maddeningly balances "Fight or Flight" between "hit" and "miss" is its absolute, and absolutely "LA," obliviousness.

Parson's "Initiator" projects photos of women around the globe, doing whatever it is those women do, onto a promisingly suggestive back drop of white sheets on a clothesline. The graceful and totally versatile women in the company enter the space. Baskets are shaken, hips are shaken, shapes are formed and dispersed. Potential becomes predictable: women spoon, women smile, women suffer, women bind together, women are women and isn't that nice and simple and pretty? If you're going for broke with cliches, go for broke. It can be done! But I tend to think (and really, why else would I write in public-ish?) that in another red-letter Year. of. Women's. Issues., it is nothing short of ignorant to make a non-committal piece of dance that openly suggests simplicity.

Maybe I'm being harsh. But whether Parson knew what he was doing is an unanswerable question! This is not to undermine his abilities as a dancer. "Initiator" constructs many beautiful, innovative, and moving (no more puns, I swear) moments out of very capable bodies. But deliberate portrayals of quote "womanhood" are very, very loaded, and should not be casual unless they're pointedly so. (If you're 18 or older and not in my family, Google coffee table book of my dreams "4 Inches".)

Parson is as indecisive as Los Angeles, and neither here nor there.

For every possibility of stealing my breath (like the shuffling feet of women from behind the clothesline set piece - they've become the bedsheets!) there is a moment to suggest that he had no idea he was stealing it. For example, the agony of social rejection is reduced to the aforementioned SYTYCD aesthetic. Hey. I love Imogen Heap as much as the next Manic Pixie Dream Girl. But more than that, I value my unique intelligence, my willingness to look past the television for dance, and the endlessly prismatic nuances of the too-often generalized sex to which my body committed itself. This first third of "Fight or Flight" (huh?) bared the internal conflict of non-street Los Angeles art to its scariest blind-spot potential. I'll probably be panicking in the blind spot for a while.

Hislop's "rEVOLUTION" annoyed me considerably less, and its costumes were some of the best I've seen in Los Angeles. Reverse corsetry gives the women massive hips and thighs, the men Hulk's bicep action. And I won't even wax redundant on casual heteronormative partnering, frontal performance, gesturing, or musical dependence. (To all I say, "plegh.") The dancers interact in ways formal and suggestive. It is a reflection, remnant of Petite Mort. Societal mores skew and dramatize the very basic elements (read: sex) of being a species.

The dancers are incredibly versatile and capable, carrying out even the most gasp-inducing leaps and poses with a sweaty, almost-casual elegance that I rarely, if ever, encounter in concert dance. But when the costumes are shed, the choreographic composure is, too. An informal hand-clasping line dance loses sight of the ballroom, and the basic black clothes (read: dance pants) hardly give Hislop's and Hutter's costuming expertise any credit. But I am curious about where Hislop can go if he tightens his focus, lets go of concert conventions, and pushes the envelope further on a few, or even just one, of the social structures he so obviously understands. "rEVOLUTION" side-steps, at least for its first half, the stereotypes of LA.

"I Ran" is Ms. Hutter's concert finale creation. It doesn't succumb to the blinders of "Initiator," but it doesn't observe like "rEVOLUTION." It has a resounding topical ADD: Televisions. Uniforms. Gender roles. Pantomime. Quaint, sweet gestures. Counting out loud. Pop music - ironic? frank?. I'm back in college! Help! Worse than that, I don't know what the flinging, sprawling style set on the dancers (who are great) is supposed to convey or accomplish.

I do know that it reflects the hyperactive, unaware, puppeteered, music-flung status of all the dances that anyone from the outside seems to see coming out of Los Angeles.

Tickets, if you want to debate with me.

Lucky Stumble

I am not a popper. I can pop!, but I don't quite make a narrative of it yet, going from Point A to Point B with an apparent plan. These people have an apparent plan.

At an anniversary party for a neighborhood boutique (without a website - but with that Cube t-shirt for sale!), a battle brought out pros and amateurs making tiny, rapidfire movements into a 21st-century meaning of Cool. I may have missed the local modern dance fare at Diavolo space yesterday, buuuuut... maybe this was better?

What's Happening

There is so much to relay about dance. Where on earth have I been, besides eating my weight in Thanksgiving goodies? Better late than never, I suppose. There are the usual suspects: upcoming events (including a visitor on the 7th), a human interest story, a great cause, a piece of music that makes me wish I had a company to boss around. Less common, and more local, a happy belated birthday to Rudy Perez! And congratulations to Heidi Duckler and dear Leslie Seiters for their appearances in a new publication about site-specific dance. I'm looking forward to the next edition of Itch Dance Journal (and the one after that, when I'll actually mind the deadlines). Best of luck to the upcoming improv festival in LA, can't wait to swing dance at the Third Street Dance Holiday Party (scroll down one poster), and you'd better believe I'm getting my tickets to the LA Ballet Nutcracker.

Anybody else?

Swingin'

I went swing dancing! Well, sort of - one class and a brief open studio way out on the west side hardly count as a wild and crazy night of being led around the dance floor. But it was a perfectly happy little evening of good old-fashioned social dance. Warm up this way, add steps that way, and next thing you know you're either floating like a cloud around an engaging, loveable partner!, or you're having all your signals crossed by a man who can't count past six. Turns out you don't get much choice sometimes.

All right... so sue me. I have ideological misgivings about surrendering the basic structure of a dance to a man. But in a recent effort I've commissioned myself to, I present to you: the positive! (That's right. The positive.) The positive is that after a long and happy few years of always demanding at least equal share in a dance, it's a little bit freeing to just shuffle my feet and swivel around under the guise of chipper surrender. I had an unbeatable sense of my partner's baffled respect as, provided he could count past six, I made the most of every structural resource on the dance floor.

As I type, I am letting a Taylor Swift song poison my mind about how love works, and I'm wondering (as I imagine many, and wiser, wonderers have) if we created these structures for social interaction just to break them when the time comes, if the Lindy or the East Coast or whatever the heck I was doing to "All Shook Up" are just launch pads to acknowledging what really matters by giving it a boundless free-for-all boogie. Is freedom from structure... transcendent?

(Answer me, Taylor!)

But I digress, and my day job beckons. Happy dancing.

Flash! A mob!

What just happened? Did I just meet up with hundreds (right?) of strangers in LA (aah, city) and bust out Janet Jackson moves in a flash mob? Why, yes. Yes I did. And it looked like this the second time:



Staci Lawrence and Conroe Brooks put their production experience and general enthusiasm (it's infectious) to the test, gaining participants from friends, family, Facebook, Twitter, and Miss Jackson's (if you're nasty) website, then having the whole lot of 'em stepping in time to a medley of the superstar's hits.

Sadly, the much-Twittered Janet appearance overshadowed the "flash" part in Round 2 (hence the aisle). Flash Mobs can be pillow fights, hug-fests... anything; in a manner somewhat typical of LA, this one served consumer culture. But hey, the first round surprised glassy-eyed Grove shoppers into unexpected delight!

What a bizarre experience. "It's really about promoting that viral grassroots side of it," Staci pointed out. And this is true: I am utterly impressed with the range of dancers, from skinny to not-skinny and tall to short, old to young and in between, obviously and sneakily devoted to Jackson. (After learning my intentions to ponder and write, one participant asked me outright: do you like Janet Jackson? I do.) The "let's just do it" attitude of the whirlwind orchestration says quite a bit about embracing spontaneity. (Cheese!) Furthermore, I've never felt so connected to so many people in this weird car-obsessed land of group solitude.

I'm disgruntled that this was, by definition, a promotion (see the tab here). But if a comedian and a singer in the TV-and-movie industry can just say "hey, let's do this" and really do it? Well, then I have no doubt that they'll keep doing this for simpler things - even better than Janet's Number Ones album.

Happy dancing!

It's Happening!

Fact: I dislike extensive program notes. I think they mute the dance. The dance should speak for itself. Down with program notes!

Now that that's out of the way, let me praise every other aspect of "Once More, Again, One," Hana van der Kolk's latest creation at Five Thirty Three. I'd been feeling a little gipped after parades & changes, replays came to REDCAT this week, as if by missing the 1960's I'd missed having my mind blown by the first run of anything.

Wrong!

With or without all the rhetoric in the program notes (which I still refuse to read), "Once More, Again, One" is part is-this-art?, part Warhol happening, and all 2009. I'm not even totally sure when the program began, although it certainly picked up when David Kendall (not the VJ) spun a song out of sounds coming from the four dancers. The performance elements are just super. (Gush!) There are solos, duos, and Lucinda Childs-ish floor patterns, not to mention enough Prince to tide me over 'til next 1999. There's stripping down and zoning out and a creepy a capella Madonna cover! But I'd rather you attend this gem of a show than read what's in it. Heck, skip parades & changes, replays. You'll be learning more about postmodern art if you see it at Five Thirty Three. It's a grungy loft two meaningfully scary blocks away from the terrain of the Downtown Art Walk. Through the former factory windows you can see a "This Is My - OUR - Town" Dodgers billboard with good ol' Villaraigosa beaming. Make what you will of that.

I am a little wary of van der Kolk's Master's Degree. The institution says a lot about dance's recent history. To slug through tuition and academic red tape in order to make warehouse art... If you ask me, it's a paradox. It's undeniably networking-friendly, and preservative to say the least, but seems to counter by its very nature how we stick it to the man. (Can we anymore?)

But hey, I'd have had not a clue of the card-carryin' dancemaker's background if I hadn't asked before the show! So shame on me.

I am thoroughly impressed and relieved to know that my generation can escape sweepstakes and YouTube (awesome though the two may be).

Now please scrap your evening plans, scrap what you learned about what dance should be, and see this performance.

parades & changes, replays (& replays & replays & replays & replays...)

Every so often I see a dance and I feel I've been given the finger. Well, hi! Anna Halprin, mother of the Planetary Dance and the happy holistic practice of movement arts for one's quality of life, you have put me in my place. I'm not particularly impressed with "parades & changes, replays," nor am I inclined to read the laborious program notes explaining the 1964 original of the 2008 recreation. I am inclined to give you, my darling reader, a play by play. Even if you read it, you'll probably be all right seeing it too.

The white noise of crowd uncontrol hums out of the speakers when a kindly man in a suit takes the stage, presumably for the standard off-with-the-cell-phones chide. Instead he conducts, and dancers sneakily seated rise and speak in French and English and who knows what else about... well, anything? Once they reach the stage, what I will call Part I is already off to a wily start. Off with the suits! On with the suits. Off with the suits again! And so on. Next thing you know there's a brown paper waterfall and a celibate orgy center stage, then the back wall opens and off they all glide, clad in wads of the waterfall. End Part I.

Jerome Delatour

In Part II, the lights are brighter and the composed, near-smirk faces are wilier, and everyone is probably more aware of my formalist eyes bugging out in the back row of the theater. (Will I ever be on time to anything?) A brief flash of Stomp later, the stage becomes aisles of 21st-century-junk-kitsch piles. This I'd been anticipating. The dancers mosey and don wacky costumes. They put wacky costumes on each other!

Jerome Delatour

There is not one pirouette, not one leap or gesture that suggests this came from a classroom. (Although, minor gripe, a few moments feel like a college class learning to make improv scores.) Generally the dance is just... there. Production value be damned, since a huge white balloon lit from the inside and a live musical score are about as complex as things get. As two critters wander out of the theater, having gone from suited to naked to suited to naked to dressed in colorful trash, I wish LA had more pedestrian traffic. It's a little bleak to see two such laissez fair art bodies wander out into the street to find... nothing.